Opinion
No. 11-1190.
Submitted: June 30, 2011.
Decided: July 5, 2011.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge (6:11-cv-00231-RBH).
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Launeil Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Tamara N. Rountree, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Launeil Sanders appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.Sanders v. Jackson, No. 6:11-cv-00231-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED