From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandeford v. Plummer

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 30, 2008
No. C 06-06794 SBA (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2008)

Opinion

No. C 06-06794 SBA (PR).

October 30, 2008


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


Plaintiff has filed a second request for an extension of time in which to file his opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Having read and considered Plaintiff's second request, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's second request for an extension of time is GRANTED. The time in which Plaintiff may file his opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment will be extended up to and including thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.

If Defendants wish to file a reply brief, they shall do so no later than fifteen (15) days after the date Plaintiff's opposition is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sandeford v. Plummer

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 30, 2008
No. C 06-06794 SBA (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Sandeford v. Plummer

Case Details

Full title:NAPOLEON SANDEFORD, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES PLUMMER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Oct 30, 2008

Citations

No. C 06-06794 SBA (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2008)