From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandeep v. Albence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 8, 2020
No. 3:20-CV-464-K (N.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:20-CV-464-K

09-08-2020

SINGH SANDEEP, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, et al., Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner's Emergency Petition for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in the Nature of a Mandamus and Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as moot.

A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required for a federal detainee to appeal the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F. 424, 425 (5th Cir. 2005). If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account.

SO ORDERED.

Signed September 8th , 2020.

/s/ _________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sandeep v. Albence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 8, 2020
No. 3:20-CV-464-K (N.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Sandeep v. Albence

Case Details

Full title:SINGH SANDEEP, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 8, 2020

Citations

No. 3:20-CV-464-K (N.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2020)