From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandberg v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 12, 2021
5:20-cv-01250-AFM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2021)

Opinion

5:20-cv-01250-AFM

10-12-2021

Catherine Sandberg v. Kilolo Kijakazi


CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Honorable: ALEXANDER F. MacKINNON, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time (ECF No. 22), order granting extension of time (ECF No. 24), and supplemental order extending time for Defendant to file her Memorandum in Support of Answer (ECF No. 25), Defendant’s Memorandum in Support of Answer was due on October 7, 2021. The docket shows that, as late as the date of this Order, Defendant has not filed the Memorandum in Support Defendant’s Answer. Defendant has failed to comply with the Court’s Order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that within 20 days of the filing date of this Order, Defendant shall show cause in writing why judgment should not be entered in favor of Plaintiff. The filing of the Memorandum in Support of Defendant’s Answer within 20 days shall discharge the order to show cause and all other deadlines required by the Case Management Order will be extended accordingly.

Additionally, Defendant shall include in her Memorandum a response to the New Authority (ECF Nos. 23, 26) and how it should affect the Court’s consideration of this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sandberg v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 12, 2021
5:20-cv-01250-AFM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Sandberg v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:Catherine Sandberg v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 12, 2021

Citations

5:20-cv-01250-AFM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2021)