From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandas v. Kraemer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 2000
275 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted May 17, 2000

August 15, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated August 23, 1999, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, and dismissed the complaint.

Francis B. A'Hearn, Hempstead, N.Y. (Stephen P. Shea of counsel), for appellants.

Jacobson Schwartz, Rockville Centre, N.Y. (Jeffrey D. Kadushin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., FRED T. SANTUCCI, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the risk which resulted in the injuries sustained by the plaintiff George Sandas is one which is inherent in the sport which he was playing, and, accordingly, that he assumed that risk (see, Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471, 484). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion.


Summaries of

Sandas v. Kraemer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 2000
275 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Sandas v. Kraemer

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE SANDAS, ET AL., appellants, v. RON KRAEMER, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 15, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
712 N.Y.S.2d 420

Citing Cases

Friedman v. Universal Martial Arts of Amer

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly determined that, under the…