From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. Toys “R” Us, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2003
303 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

352

March 4, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered April 22, 2002, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Carol R. Finocchio, for plaintiff-respondent.

Robert M. Ortiz, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Rosenberger, Williams, Gonzalez, JJ.


Defendant fails to establish that, under the circumstances prevailing at its store just two days before Christmas, the rack over which plaintiff tripped, three feet wide by four feet long but only a few inches high, was so readily observable as to warrant summary judgment in its favor. Defendant's contention that it had no notice of the dangerous condition is improperly raised for the first time on appeal, and we decline to consider it.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Sanchez v. Toys “R” Us, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2003
303 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Sanchez v. Toys “R” Us, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GLADYS SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TOYS R US, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 4, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 884

Citing Cases

Robinson v. 206-16 Hollis Ave. Food Corp.

To be entitled to summary judgment, the defendant was required to show, prima facie, that it maintained its…

Mauriello v. Port Auth. of N.Y. N.J

Whether an asserted hazard is open and obvious cannot be divorced from the surrounding circumstances. A…