From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 16, 2002
806 So. 2d 564 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-4114

Opinion filed January 16, 2002

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Richard I. Wennet, Judge; L.T. Case No. 88-3530CFA02.

Antonio Sanchez, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


As we did in Stretcher v. State, 01-2943 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we affirm the denial of appellant's rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001):

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

GUNTHER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sanchez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 16, 2002
806 So. 2d 564 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Sanchez v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 16, 2002

Citations

806 So. 2d 564 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. State

May 06, 2002. Appeal from the 4th DCA 806 So.2d 564. Rev.…