From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 28, 2001
801 So. 2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 2D00-1314

Opinion filed November 28, 2001.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Robert J. Simms, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah F. Hogge, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Andrew Sanchez challenges the circuit court's denial after a hearing of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion that alleged prosecutorial misconduct for comments made during the State's closing argument. He argues that new case law entitles him to relief. However, because the case law cited by Sanchez does not reflect a new statement of the law, we affirm the trial court's denial of his rule 3.850 motion.

Furthermore, any ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim that Sanchez might have raised in a 3.850 motion underNahm v. State, 760 So.2d 253 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), is now time-barred, unless he can demonstrate his entitlement to a belated 3.850 motion pursuant to Medrano v. State, 748 So.2d 986 (Fla. 1999).

Affirmed.

BLUE, C.J., and STRINGER, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Sanchez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 28, 2001
801 So. 2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Sanchez v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 28, 2001

Citations

801 So. 2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)