From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. Rigney

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 10, 2023
3:22-cv-00259-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Feb. 10, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00259-MMD-CSD

02-10-2023

JASMINE SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, v. CHET RIGNEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is referred to the Court for the limited purpose of determining whether Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. This Court certifies that any in forma pauperis appeal from its order of dismissal would be frivolous or would not be taken “in good faith” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should be revoked on appeal. See Hooker v. Am. Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (concluding that revocation of in forma pauperis status is appropriate where the district court finds the appeal to be frivolous).


Summaries of

Sanchez v. Rigney

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 10, 2023
3:22-cv-00259-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Feb. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Sanchez v. Rigney

Case Details

Full title:JASMINE SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, v. CHET RIGNEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 10, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00259-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Feb. 10, 2023)