From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. Rigney

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 31, 2023
3:22-CV-00109-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Jul. 31, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-CV-00109-ART-CLB

07-31-2023

JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, v. CHET RIGNEY, Defendant.


ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On July 5, 2023, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 28). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition.

The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to August 30, 2023, to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to the court for decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sanchez v. Rigney

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 31, 2023
3:22-CV-00109-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Jul. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Sanchez v. Rigney

Case Details

Full title:JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, v. CHET RIGNEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jul 31, 2023

Citations

3:22-CV-00109-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Jul. 31, 2023)