From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. Manning

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 2, 2020
Case No. 3:19-cv-00757-RCJ-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 2, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 3:19-cv-00757-RCJ-CLB

01-02-2020

JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ, Plaintiff v. SCOTT MANNING, Defendant


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

Plaintiff, who is an inmate in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections ("NDOC"), has submitted a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1-1). Plaintiff has neither paid the full filing fee for this matter nor filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and Local Rule LSR 1-2, Plaintiff must complete an application to proceed in forma pauperis and attach both an inmate account statement for the past six months and a properly executed financial certificate. The Court will retain Plaintiff's civil rights complaint (ECF No. 1-1), but will not file it until the matter of the payment of the filing fee is resolved. Plaintiff will be granted an opportunity to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or in the alternative, pay the full filing fee for this action. If Plaintiff chooses to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis he must file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, including both an inmate account statement for the past six months and a properly executed financial certificate.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court WILL SEND Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff must either: (1) file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, on the correct form with complete financial attachments in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); or (2) pay the full $400 fee for filing a civil action (which includes the $350 filing fee and the $50 administrative fee).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, dismissal of this action may result.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will retain the complaint (ECF No. 1-1) but will not file it at this time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 2, 2020.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Sanchez v. Manning

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 2, 2020
Case No. 3:19-cv-00757-RCJ-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 2, 2020)
Case details for

Sanchez v. Manning

Case Details

Full title:JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ, Plaintiff v. SCOTT MANNING, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 2, 2020

Citations

Case No. 3:19-cv-00757-RCJ-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 2, 2020)