Opinion
11296N Index 300619/14
03-19-2020
Felicidad SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants–Respondents.
Massimo & Panetta, P.C., Mineola (Nicholas J. Massimo of counsel), for appellant. Georgia M. Pestana, Acting Corporation Counsel, New York (Elina Druker of counsel), for respondents.
Massimo & Panetta, P.C., Mineola (Nicholas J. Massimo of counsel), for appellant.
Georgia M. Pestana, Acting Corporation Counsel, New York (Elina Druker of counsel), for respondents.
Renwick, J.P., Gische, Mazzarelli, Webber, Singh, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered on or about October 1, 2018, which denied plaintiff's motion for spoliation sanctions, unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, and the motion granted to the extent of imposing an adverse inference charge.
Defendants had an obligation to preserve the pre-accident audio recordings at the time they were destroyed because the Police Department (NYPD) internal report and plaintiff's notice of claim, which attached the public police accident report, put defendants on notice that they would likely assert an emergency operation defense. Therefore, pre-accident audio communication between the dispatcher and the NYPD vehicle or officers involved in the accident should have been preserved in case it was needed for future litigation (see Maiorano v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., 124 A.D.3d 536, 998 N.Y.S.2d 629 [1st Dept. 2015] ; Malouf v. Equinox Holdings, Inc., 113 A.D.3d 422, 978 N.Y.S.2d 160 [1st Dept. 2014] ). Under the circumstances presented, the imposition of an adverse inference charge would be an appropriate sanction (see Suazo v. Linden Plaza Assoc., L.P., 102 A.D.3d 570, 571, 958 N.Y.S.2d 389 [1st Dept. 2013] ; Metropolitan N.Y. Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty v. FGP Bush Term., 1 A.D.3d 168, 768 N.Y.S.2d 190 [1st Dept. 2003] ).