From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 2002
299 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-03477

Argued October 17, 2002.

November 18, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), entered April 11, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against him on the issue of liability, dismissed the complaint.

Norman Leonard Cousins, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Francis F. Caputo and George Gutwirth of counsel), for respondents.

Before: NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, THOMAS A. ADAMS, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in excluding certain evidence on the ground that it was irrelevant, collateral, or otherwise incompetent (see Coopersmith v. Gold, 89 N.Y.2d 957, 959; Feldsberg v. Nitschke, 49 N.Y.2d 636, 643). Furthermore, although an "ambulance call report" and a statement by an ambulance attendant were hearsay and, therefore, improperly admitted into evidence, the errors were harmless (see Rizzuto v. Getty Petroleum Corp., 289 A.D.2d 217; Barracato v. Camp Bauman Buses, 217 A.D.2d 677; Willinger v. City of New Rochelle, 212 A.D.2d 526).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

SMITH, J.P., SCHMIDT, ADAMS and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sanchez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 2002
299 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Sanchez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:REYNALDO SANCHEZ, ETC., APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 18, 2002

Citations

299 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
749 N.Y.S.2d 744

Citing Cases

Stero v. Ulla Kristiina Laakso, M.D.

The ambulance call report, and the information contained therein, are hearsay and are precluded at the time…

Dank v. Sears Holding Mgmt. Corp.

Here, it was within the Supreme Court's discretionary power to limit the plaintiff's use of interrogatories…