Opinion
No. 05-56665.
This panel grants appellant's unopposed motion to submit without oral argument.
Filed February 13, 2007.
Alejandro Garcia, Esq., City of Commerce, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Erika Johnson-Brooks, Esq., Jason K. Axe, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-05-04194-GAF.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appellant's argument that the REAL ID Act's repeal of habeas jurisdiction over final removal orders violates the Suspension Clause, is foreclosed by Puri v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 1038, 1041-42 (9th Cir. 2006). The district court thus did not err in dismissing the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.