From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. Beauty Indus. Grp. Opco

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 24, 2024
CV 24-02341-SPG-BFM (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-02341-SPG-BFM

05-24-2024

Karen Sanchez v. Beauty Industry Group Opco, LLC et al


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER

Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Linkv. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before June 5, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Defendants Beauty Industry Group, Opco LLC and Bellami Hair, LLC did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Plaintiffs can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sanchez v. Beauty Indus. Grp. Opco

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 24, 2024
CV 24-02341-SPG-BFM (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Sanchez v. Beauty Indus. Grp. Opco

Case Details

Full title:Karen Sanchez v. Beauty Industry Group Opco, LLC et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 24, 2024

Citations

CV 24-02341-SPG-BFM (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)