From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanborn v. Grounds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 3, 2011
CASE NO. EDCV 10-1303-VAP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. EDCV 10-1303-VAP (PJW)

08-03-2011

DONALD EDWARD SANBORN, Petitioner, v. RANDY GROUNDS, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Final Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Rule 11(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sanborn v. Grounds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 3, 2011
CASE NO. EDCV 10-1303-VAP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Sanborn v. Grounds

Case Details

Full title:DONALD EDWARD SANBORN, Petitioner, v. RANDY GROUNDS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 3, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. EDCV 10-1303-VAP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)