From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanborn v. Dentalone Partners, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2018
Case No. 2:17-cv-875 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 23, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-cv-875

04-23-2018

MELODIE SANBORN, Plaintiff, v. DENTALONE PARTNERS, INC., et al., Defendants.


CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the United States Magistrate Judge's April 6, 2018 Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that failure to object within fourteen days would result in a waiver of review. The time period for objections has run, and no party has objected. Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18). For the reasons set forth in that document, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 11) and REMANDS this action to the Franklin County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas. The Court declines to award Plaintiff attorney fees and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 4-23-2018
DATE

/s/ _________

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sanborn v. Dentalone Partners, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2018
Case No. 2:17-cv-875 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Sanborn v. Dentalone Partners, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MELODIE SANBORN, Plaintiff, v. DENTALONE PARTNERS, INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 23, 2018

Citations

Case No. 2:17-cv-875 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 23, 2018)