From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sananikone v. United States

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2011
No. CIV-S-07-1434 KJM KJN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-07-1434 KJM KJN.

October 19, 2011


ORDER


This order confirms a bench order issued on the first day of trial, October 18, 2011.

Sananikone has submitted a general verdict with special interrogatories under Fed.R.Civ.P. 49(b). Whether to give such a verdict is within the trial court's discretion. Cancellier v. Federated Department Stores, 672 F.2d 1312 (9th Cir. 1982). A general verdict with special interrogatories is returned "upon one or more issues of fact the decision of which is necessary to a verdict." Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., 339 F.3d 1020, 1031 (9th Cir. 2003).

Sananikone has asked the jury to answer interrogatories corresponding to factors developed in the case law for determining whether a person is "responsible" within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. section 6672. The Ninth Circuit has recognized several factors "relevant to whether an individual" is a responsible party. United States v. Jones, 33 F.3d 1137, 1140 (9th Cir. 1994), but the ultimate issue of fact necessary to the verdict is whether the party is responsible. Plaintiff has not cited to authority requiring that the wide range of factors set forth in his proposed verdict form be identified by the jury in returning the verdict. Given the range of factors relevant to the determination, the court declines to list any combination of these on the verdict form.

DATED: October 18, 2011.


Summaries of

Sananikone v. United States

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2011
No. CIV-S-07-1434 KJM KJN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Sananikone v. United States

Case Details

Full title:PUONGPUN SANANIKONE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, v…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

No. CIV-S-07-1434 KJM KJN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)