From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

San Jose Div. Genentech, Inc. v. Trs. of the Univ. of Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 31, 2011
Case No: 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

Case No: 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG)

10-31-2011

GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation, Defendant and Counterclaimant.

M. PATRICIA THAYER SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP SANDRA S. FUJIYAMA SAMUEL N. TIU TASHICA T. WILLIAMS SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP JEFFREY P. KUSHAN (pro hac vice) JAMES A. HIGH JR. (SBN 240781) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP ROBERT A. VAN NEST ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020) SARA B. FAULKNER KEKER & VAN NEST LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant GENENTECH, INC.


M. PATRICIA THAYER

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

SANDRA S. FUJIYAMA

SAMUEL N. TIU

TASHICA T. WILLIAMS

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

JEFFREY P. KUSHAN (pro hac vice)

JAMES A. HIGH JR. (SBN 240781)

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

ROBERT A. VAN NEST

ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020)

SARA B. FAULKNER

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff and

Counterclaim Defendant

GENENTECH, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

GENENTECH'S ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO LODGE UNDER

GENENTECH'S SEAL LETTER BRIEF

IN OPPOSITION TO UPENN'S MOTION

TO COMPEL RE: ROCHE DOCUMENTS

Having reviewed Genentech's Administrative Motion to Lodge Under Seal Genentech's Letter Brief in Opposition to UPenn's Motion to Compel re: Roche Documents and the Declaration of James A. High Jr. in Support of Genentech's Administrative Motion to Lodge Under Seal Genentech's Letter Brief in Opposition to UPenn's Motion to Compel re: Roche Documents, and for good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the following shall be sealed:

1. The second through sixth sentences (including citations) of the full paragraph on page 3 of Genentech's Letter Brief in Opposition to UPenn's Motion to Compel re: Roche Documents ("Letter Brief"); and

2. the Declaration of Daniel Wan in Support of Genentech's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel re: Roche Documents.

It is further ORDERED that Genentech shall file an appropriately redacted version of its Letter Brief, redacting the second through sixth sentences (including citations) of the full paragraph on page 3.

SO ORDERED.

Paul S. Grewal

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

San Jose Div. Genentech, Inc. v. Trs. of the Univ. of Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 31, 2011
Case No: 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

San Jose Div. Genentech, Inc. v. Trs. of the Univ. of Pennsylvania

Case Details

Full title:GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. THE TRUSTEES OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

Case No: 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)