asserting that court of appeals' exercise in a civil case of pendant appellate jurisdiction was "clearly in tension with our rationale in Abney"
Summary of this case from Roberson v. MullinsNos. 84-763, 84-1018.
March 4, 1985.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 737 F. 2d 246.
asserting that court of appeals' exercise in a civil case of pendant appellate jurisdiction was "clearly in tension with our rationale in Abney"
Summary of this case from Roberson v. MullinsFull title:SAN FILIPPO v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK ET AL.; and UNITED…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 4, 1985
As stated in MacDonald: "[A] federal court of appeals is without pendent jurisdiction over otherwise…