From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

San Antonio A. P. Ry. v. Gooch

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin
Jan 31, 1923
247 S.W. 917 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Opinion

No. 6523.

December 20, 1922. Rehearing Denied January 31, 1923.

Appeal from McLennan County Court; Giles P. Lester, Judge.

Action by Frank Gooch against the San Antonio Aransas Pass Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Taylor Hale, of Waco, for appellant.

H. O. Dabney and F. M. Fitzpatrick, both of Waco, for appellee.


This is a damage suit against a railway company, in which the plaintiff was successful, and the defendant has appealed.

The questions presented in appellant's brief have all been carefully considered, and, as they present nothing new, and as this court is quite willing to comply with the recommendation of the American Bar Association, and the suggestion often made by attorneys generally (except in their own cases) to the effect that appellate courts decide more cases without written opinions, we refrain from writing an extended opinion, and announce that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

San Antonio A. P. Ry. v. Gooch

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin
Jan 31, 1923
247 S.W. 917 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)
Case details for

San Antonio A. P. Ry. v. Gooch

Case Details

Full title:SAN ANTONIO A. P. RY. CO. v. GOOCH

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin

Date published: Jan 31, 1923

Citations

247 S.W. 917 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Citing Cases

Wilkerson v. Angel

We have carefully considered the entire record and briefs and oral arguments in behalf of both parties, and…

Northern Texas Traction v. S. Surety

We could with all propriety leave the discussion of the case here and affirm the judgment. S. A. A. P. R.…