Opinion
6:21-cv-870-RBD-LRH
01-04-2022
Gregory Kevin Samuels, Pro se Plaintiff
Gregory Kevin Samuels, Pro se Plaintiff
ORDER
ROY B. DALTON JR., United States District Judge
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, moved for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 54 (“Motion”)). On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56 (“R&R”)) submitting that the Motion should be denied. Plaintiff did not object and the time to do so has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The R&R (Doc. 56) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of
this Order in its entirety.
2. Plaintiffs Motion (Doc. 54) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.