From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samuels v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Sep 9, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-1812-P (W.D. La. Sep. 9, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-1812-P

09-09-2014

ONTARIO SAMUELS v. WARDEN


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and noting the lack of written objections filed by Petitioner and determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies.

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the U.S. District Courts requires the district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. The court, after considering the record in this case and the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. Section 2253, denies a certificate of appealability because the applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 9th day of September 2014.

/s/________

TOM STAGG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Samuels v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Sep 9, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-1812-P (W.D. La. Sep. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Samuels v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:ONTARIO SAMUELS v. WARDEN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Sep 9, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-1812-P (W.D. La. Sep. 9, 2014)