From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samuels v. Trivascular, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 3, 2016
2016-1490 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 3, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1490

11-03-2016

SHAUN L.W. SAMUELS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TRIVASCULAR, INC., MICHAEL V. CHOBOTOV, ROBERT G. WHIRLEY, JOSEPH W. HUMPHREY, Defendants-Appellees

JAMES D. PETRUZZI, The Petruzzi Law Firm, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by EVERETT G. DIEDERIKS, JR., NICHOLAS SPENCER WHITELAW, Diederiks & Whitelaw PC, Woodbridge, VA. WILLIAM H. BURGESS, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by JOHN C. O'QUINN.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:13-cv-02261-EMC, Judge Edward M. Chen.

JUDGMENT

JAMES D. PETRUZZI, The Petruzzi Law Firm, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by EVERETT G. DIEDERIKS, JR., NICHOLAS SPENCER WHITELAW, Diederiks & Whitelaw PC, Woodbridge, VA. WILLIAM H. BURGESS, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by JOHN C. O'QUINN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 3, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Samuels v. Trivascular, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 3, 2016
2016-1490 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Samuels v. Trivascular, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHAUN L.W. SAMUELS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TRIVASCULAR, INC., MICHAEL V…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 3, 2016

Citations

2016-1490 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 3, 2016)