From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samuels v. Longnecker

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 16, 2024
C. A. 22-228 Erie (W.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2024)

Opinion

C. A. 22-228 Erie

04-16-2024

DARIUS SAMUELS, Plaintiff, v. DR. LONGNECKER, et al., Defendants. District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter


The Honorable Richard A. Lanzillo Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Darius Samuels, an inmate incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Albion, Pennsylvania (“SCI-Albion”), initiated this civil rights action by filing a pro se complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Defendants Nicholas Longnecker, M.D., Larry Kneiss CRNP, and Daniel Stroup, P.A., all of whom provide medical services to inmates at SCI-Albion. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of his rights under the eighth amendment to the United States Constitution. This matter was referred to Chief United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

Following discovery, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on October 16, 2023 [ECF No. 35]. Plaintiff filed an affidavit in opposition to Defendants' motion but did not file either a brief or a response to Defendants' concise statement of material facts, despite the issuance of a show cause order by Chief Magistrate Judge Lanzillo on February 8, 2024 [ECF No. 44].

On March 14, 2024, Judge Lanzillo issued a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted on all claims in this case. [ECF No. 45]. In particular, Judge Lanzillo concluded that Plaintiff has failed to establish he suffered from a serious medical need or that Defendants acted with deliberate indifference to his medical complaints. (Id. at p. 10). Objections to the R&R were due to be filed by April 1, 2024; however, no timely objections have been received.

Thus, after de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2024;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 35] is GRANTED, and judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all claims in this case. The report and recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Lanzillo, issued March 14, 2024 [ECF No. 45], is adopted as the opinion of the court.

The Clerk is directed to mark this case closed.


Summaries of

Samuels v. Longnecker

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 16, 2024
C. A. 22-228 Erie (W.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Samuels v. Longnecker

Case Details

Full title:DARIUS SAMUELS, Plaintiff, v. DR. LONGNECKER, et al., Defendants. District…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 16, 2024

Citations

C. A. 22-228 Erie (W.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2024)