From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samuels v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Jan 24, 2022
17-cv-60910-KMM (S.D. Fla. Jan. 24, 2022)

Opinion

17-cv-60910-KMM

01-24-2022

MARCIA BONAVIA SAMUELS, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, [1] Defendant.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

K. MICHAEL MOORE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff Marcia Bonavia Samuel's (“Plaintiff”) Unopposed Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (“Mot.”) (ECF No. 26). The Court referred the matter to the Honorable Lauren F. Louis, United States Magistrate Judge, to issue a report and recommendation. (ECF No. 29). Magistrate Judge Louis issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Plaintiff's Motion be granted in part. (ECF No. 32). No. objections were filed and the time to do so has passed. The matter is now ripe for review.

The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3).

Pursuant to the EAJA, Plaintiff seeks to recover $25,735.94 in attorney's fees, $585.08 in travel expenses, and $3,763.35 in costs. (ECF No. 26-2) at 5. As set forth in the R&R, Magistrate Judge Louis determined that Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees under the EAJA because Plaintiff is the prevailing party, Defendant's position was not substantially justified, and Plaintiff's net worth was less than two million dollars at the time the proceeding was filed. R&R at 2. Magistrate Judge Louis also determined that the attorney's fees requested are reasonable after review of Plaintiff's counsel's itemized time entries for litigation of this case both before this Court and the Eleventh Circuit, Plaintiff's counsel's experience, and Plaintiff's counsel's reputation. Id. at 2-3.

Magistrate Judge Louis declined to determine the propriety of including 13.7 hours of attorney travel time in the requested fee award because the Parties reached an informal agreement to decrease the total amount of requested fees from $30,881.49 to $25,735.94. R&R at 3 (citing ECF No. 26-2)).

Magistrate Judge Louis also determined that Plaintiff is entitled to $585.08 in expenses incurred attendant to travel for oral the argument in this case at the Eleventh Circuit because such expenses were reasonable and necessary to the litigation of Plaintiff's case. Id. at 3-4. In addition, Magistrate Judge Louis recommends that Plaintiff be awarded costs, but that the amount sought be reduced for costs not explicitly enumerated under § 1920 and for which Plaintiff does not provide justification. Id. at 4-6. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Louis recommends that Plaintiff be awarded $3,325.14 in costs. Id. at 7. Finally, Magistrate Judge Louis determined that the attorney's fees, expenses, and costs should be payable to Plaintiff's counsel “once the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff owes no debt to the United States.” Id.

This sum comprises $905.00 in filing fees and $2,858.35 in printing costs, reduced by the following nonrecoverable costs: (1) $204.98 in total FedEx shipment costs, (2) $80.00 in messenger costs, (3) $11.23 in postage costs, and (4) $142.00 in paralegal time where Plaintiff does not argue the paralegal was engaged in non-clerical tasks or work traditionally done by an attorney within the scope of permissible fees. R&R at 6.

This Court agrees.

Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the R&R, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Louis's R&R (ECF No. 32) is ADOPTED. Consistent with Magistrate Judge Louis's R&R, Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff is awarded $25,735.94 in attorney's fees, $585.08 in expenses, and $3,325.14 in costs, which should be sent to Plaintiff s counsel after the Government determines whether Plaintiff owes a federal debt.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Samuels v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Jan 24, 2022
17-cv-60910-KMM (S.D. Fla. Jan. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Samuels v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:MARCIA BONAVIA SAMUELS, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Jan 24, 2022

Citations

17-cv-60910-KMM (S.D. Fla. Jan. 24, 2022)

Citing Cases

Alushani v. ICS Grp.

Counsel should not, however, recover $18.50 for sending a “demand letter” via Fed Ex because courts in this…

Alushani v. ICS Grp.

Counsel should not, however, recover $18.50 for sending a “demand letter” via Fed Ex because courts in this…