From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samuels v. Feiner Trinh International, LLC

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 28, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02574-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02574-WYD-BNB.

July 28, 2011


ORDER


This matter arises on the following papers filed by the defendants:

1. A letter addressed to me by Mr. Feiner requesting clarification of a letter he received from plaintiff's counsel [Doc. #40, filed 04/11/2011];

2. A copy of Mr. Feiner's responses to the plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories [Doc. #41, filed 04/14/2011];

3. A copy of Mr. Trinh's responses to the plaintiff's Requests for Admission [Doc. #42, filed 05/06/2011];

4. A copy of Mr. Trinh's responses to the plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories [Doc. #43, filed 05/06/2011];

5. A copy of a witness list submitted by one or both of the defendants with an attached letter from one of the witnesses [Doc. #50, filed 05/19/2011]; and

6. A letter from Mr. Feiner addressed to "Bell Pollock Judge Boland" [Doc. #52, filed 06/01/2011].

The filing of these materials is inappropriate for several reasons. Document #40 is a letter addressed to me from Mr. Feiner. Mr. Feiner requests assistance in interpreting correspondence he received from plaintiff's counsel. "[A] request for a court order must be made by motion." Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(b)(1). The plaintiff may not seek a court order through letters. All requests must be made in the form of a motion, and the request must be titled and formatted as a motion.

In addition, although the letter states that "[t]he same responses which were sent to your offices were also sent to the plaintiff's counsel," the letter does not certify that Mr. Feiner sent a copy of the letter and its attachments to plaintiff's counsel. I previously cautioned the defendants that "every document filed with the court must be served on all other parties or their counsel, and a certificate of service complying with D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1G. must accompany all papers filed or served."

Documents #41, #42, and #43 are copies of the defendants' responses to the plaintiff's discovery requests. Discovery materials shall not be filed with the Court. Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(d).

Document #50 is a witness list from one or both of the individual defendants. Witness lists are to be included as part of the pretrial order after the close of discovery and following a pretrial conference.

Document #51 is a letter from Mr. Feiner addressed to me which states that Mr. Feiner will be available for a subpoena. The letter does not contain a certificate of service. As discussed above, the defendant may not communicate with me through letters; he may not file discovery materials; and he must certify that he has served all papers filed in this court on opposing counsel.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) Docs. #40, 41, 42, 43, 50, and 52 are STRICKEN;

(2) All future applications to the court for relief shall be submitted in the form of a motion in compliance with Rule 7;

(3) All papers shall be served on counsel for the plaintiff in accordance with Rule 5 and shall be accompanied by a proper Certificate of Service;

(4) The defendants shall cease filing discovery materials with the court; and

(5) Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions against the defendants.


Summaries of

Samuels v. Feiner Trinh International, LLC

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 28, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02574-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Samuels v. Feiner Trinh International, LLC

Case Details

Full title:APRIL SAMUELS, Plaintiff, v. FEINER TRINH INTERNATIONAL, LLC, d/b/a/ Deli…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 28, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02574-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 28, 2011)