From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samuel v. Frohnmayer

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 25, 1987
84 Or. App. 80 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

137346; CA A37404

On appellant's motion for reconsideration filed November 28, 1986.

Motion for reconsideration allowed, former opinion ( 82 Or. App. 375, 728 P.2d 97 (1986), modified and adhered to as modified February 25, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Marion County, Duane R. Ertsgaard, Judge.

David C. Force, Eugene, for petition.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.


ROSSMAN, J.

Motion for reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.


On appellant's motion for reconsideration of our opinion, 82 Or. App. 375, 728 P.2d 97 (1986), we amend footnote 1, 82 Or App at 377, to read:

"We express no opinion with respect to plaintiff's contention that he is also entitled to indemnification for expenses incurred in the prosecution of this action."

Motion for reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.


Summaries of

Samuel v. Frohnmayer

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 25, 1987
84 Or. App. 80 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Samuel v. Frohnmayer

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL, Appellant, v. FROHNMAYER et al, Respondents

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 25, 1987

Citations

84 Or. App. 80 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Welker ex rel. Bradbury v. Teacher Standards & Practices Commission

See also Gill v. SAIF, 314 Or. 719, 724-25, 842 P.2d 402 (1992) ("The legislature enacted [ORS 30.285(1)] to…

Giese v. Bay Area Health District

The issue is whether that is the result that the legislature intended. In Samuel v. Frohnmayer, 82 Or. App.…