From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samsung Electronics Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2011
Case No. C-11-2620 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C-11-2620 EMC Case No. C-11-3170 EMC

10-17-2011

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., Plaintiff, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. Defendant.


RELATED CASES


CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10, THE FOLLOWING DEADLINES ARE HEREBY ORDERED:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦1. TRIAL ¦To be set later ¦ ¦DATE: ¦ ¦ +-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦Prior to completion of ADR, each party is limited to: ¦ ¦ ¦per stipulation in Joint Case Management Statement, pg. 6-13. ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Interrogatories _ ¦ ¦2. DISCOVERY ¦ ¦ ¦LIMITATIONS: ¦Depositions _ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Document Requests _ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦(narrowly tailored to facilitate mediation) ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦Requests for Admission _ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦After ADR, each party is limited to: Interrogatories _ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Depositions _ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Document Requests Requests for Admission_ ¦ +------------+----------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦Court-sponsored mediation Court-sponsored ENE Mag. Judge ¦ ¦3. ADR: ¦Settlement Conf. Private mediation _ Private arbitration Other: ¦ ¦ ¦Parties to comply with ITC mandated ADR process; parties to ¦ ¦ ¦notify the Court if local ADR is desired. ¦ +------------+----------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦4. LAST DAY ¦ ¦ ¦TO ADD ¦11/30/2011 ¦ ¦PARTIES: ¦ ¦ +------------+----------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦5. FURTHER ¦ ¦ ¦STATUS ¦01/27/2012, at 10:30 a.m. ¦ ¦CONFERENCE: ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

OTHER DEADLINES:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦6. INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS: ¦12/16/2011 ¦ +-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------¦ ¦7. ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT ¦12/23/2011 ¦ ¦PRODUCTION: ¦ ¦ +-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------¦ ¦8. INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS: ¦02/17/2012 ¦ +-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------¦ ¦9. ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT ¦02/24/2012 ¦ ¦PRODUCTION: ¦ ¦ +-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------¦ ¦10. EXCHANGE OF PROPOSED TERMS ¦ ¦ ¦AND CLAIM ELEMENTS FOR ¦03/16/2012 ¦ ¦CONSTRUCTION: ¦ ¦ +-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦Number of terms to be construed not to exceed¦ ¦ ¦ten (10). Parties shall comply with Pat. L.R.¦ ¦ ¦4-1(b). ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦11. EXCHANGE OF PRELIMINARY¦ ¦ ¦CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND ¦04/06/2012 ¦ ¦EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: ¦ ¦ +---------------------------+-------------------------------------------------¦ ¦12. JOINT CLAIM ¦ ¦ ¦CONSTRUCTION CHART & ¦04/20/2012 ¦ ¦PREHEARING STATEMENT: ¦ ¦ +---------------------------+-------------------------------------------------¦ ¦13. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ¦05/04/2012 ¦ ¦DISCOVERY CUT-OFF: ¦ ¦ +---------------------------+-------------------------------------------------¦ ¦14. TUTORIAL: ¦09/06/2012 at 2:30 p.m. ¦ +---------------------------+-------------------------------------------------¦ ¦15. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ¦Hearing on 09/20/2012 at 2:30 p.m. Opening brief ¦ ¦HEARING: ¦to be filed by 07/20/2012 Opposition to be filed ¦ ¦ ¦by 08/03/2012 Reply to be filed by 08/10/2012 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

EDWARD M. CHEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Samsung Electronics Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2011
Case No. C-11-2620 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Samsung Electronics Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., Plaintiff, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

Case No. C-11-2620 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)