From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samsung Elecs. Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)
Oct 20, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC

10-20-2011

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. AU OPTRONICS CORP., et al., Defendants.

GEORGE RILEY (CA Bar No. 118304) DARIN SNYDER (CA Bar No. 136003) O’MELVENY&MYERS LLP MARK SAMUELS (CA Bar No. 107026) BRIAN M. BERLINER (CA Bar No. 156732) RYAN YAGURA (CA Bar No. 197619 MARCUS S. QUINTANILLA (CA Bar No. 202994) VISION L. WINTER (CA Bar No. 234172) O’MELVENY&MYERS LLP Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and Related Parties


GEORGE RILEY (CA Bar No. 118304) DARIN SNYDER (CA Bar No. 136003)

O’MELVENY&MYERS LLP

MARK SAMUELS (CA Bar No. 107026)

BRIAN M. BERLINER (CA Bar No. 156732)

RYAN YAGURA (CA Bar No. 197619

MARCUS S. QUINTANILLA (CA Bar No. 202994)

VISION L. WINTER (CA Bar No. 234172)

O’MELVENY&MYERS LLP

Attorneys for

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and Related Parties

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-1(A) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SAMSUNG TO RESPOND TO AUO'S COUNTERCLAIMS

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America (collectively, "AUO") and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, "Samsung") stipulate to extend the time within which Samsung is permitted to answer or otherwise respond to the counterclaims asserted in this consolidated action, including claims asserted in the Amended Complaint originally filed in Case No. 3:11-CV-03170-EMC, which has been consolidated herewith. The stipulated response date is December 1, 2011. This will not alter any deadlines fixed by the Court. Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B regarding signatures, Brian Berliner hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory listed below.

Respectfully submitted,

O’MELVENY&MYERS LLP

Brian M. Berliner

Marcus S. Quintanilla

Vision Winter

Counsel for

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung

Electronics America, Inc.

LATHAM &WATKINS LLP

Bob Steinberg

Lawrence J. Gotts

Bert C. Reiser

Counsel for

AU Optronics Corporation and

AU Optronics Corporation America

Judge Edward M. Chen


Summaries of

Samsung Elecs. Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)
Oct 20, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Samsung Elecs. Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. AU OPTRONICS CORP., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)