From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samsung Elecs. Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)
Nov 10, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC

11-10-2011

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. AU OPTRONICS CORP., et al., Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

Respectfully submitted, O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Brian M. Berliner Marcus S. Quintanilla Vision Winter Counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. AT&T Mobility LLC Best Buy Stores, L.P., BestBuy.com, LLC Best Buy Purchasing, LLC Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a BrandsMart U.S.A. Bob Steinberg Lawrence J. Gotts Bert C. Reiser Counsel for AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI James C. Yoon S. Michael Song Albert Shih Kirin K. Gill Counsel for Respondents Acer Inc., Acer America Corporation, BenQ Corp., and BenQ America Corp. KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP Michael A. Dorfman Counsel for Respondents Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. and Sanyo Manufacturing Corporation


GEORGE RILEY (CA Bar No. 118304)

DARIN SNYDER (CA Bar No. 136003)

O'Melveny & Myers LLP

MARK SAMUELS (CA Bar No. 107026)

BRIAN M. BERLINER (CA Bar No. 156732)

RYAN YAGURA (CA Bar No. 197619

MARCUS S. QUINTANILLA (CA Bar No. 202994)

VISION L. WINTER (CA Bar No. 234172)

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Attorneys for

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and Related Parties

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL

L.R. 6-1(B) FOR EXTENSION AND/OR

CREATION OF DEADLINE TO AMEND

PLEADINGS ; ORDER

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America (collectively, "AUO"); Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, "Samsung"); Acer Inc., Acer America Corp., BenQ Corp., BenQ America Corp., SANYO Electronic Co., Inc., SANYO Manufacturing Corp. (collectively, "AUO Customer Counterclaim Defendants"); AT&T Mobility LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., BestBuy.com, LLC, Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, and Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a BrandsMart U.S.A. (collectively, "Samsung Customer Defendants") stipulate to extend and/or create the deadline by which the aforementioned parties are permitted to amend pleadings in this consolidated action.

WHEREAS, the Court's Case Management and Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt. #68) set November 30, 2011, as the deadline for the last day to add parties, but did not explicitly set a deadline to amend pleadings;

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated and the Court approved (Dkt. #62 in Case No. 3:11-cv-03170-EMC and Dkt. #74 in Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC) to extend until December 1, 2011, the deadline by which Samsung, Samsung Customer Defendants, AUO, and AUO Customer Counterclaim Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the operative claims and counterclaims filed in this action;

WHEREAS, the parties prefer, consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1), that the deadline to amend pleadings be set after the current (December 1, 2011) deadline to respond to the operative claims and counterclaims.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL AND SUBJECT TO THE APPROvAL OF THE COURT, AS FOLLOWS:

The deadline by which the parties are permitted to amend pleadings without leave of Court is set for December 22, 2011, which is three weeks following the current deadline for responding to the operative claims and counterclaims. Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B regarding signatures, Marcus S. Quintanilla hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory listed below.

Respectfully submitted,

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Brian M. Berliner

Marcus S. Quintanilla

Vision Winter

Counsel for

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

AT&T Mobility LLC

Best Buy Stores, L.P.,

BestBuy.com, LLC

Best Buy Purchasing, LLC

Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a

BrandsMart U.S.A.

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Bob Steinberg

Lawrence J. Gotts

Bert C. Reiser

Counsel for

AU Optronics Corporation and

AU Optronics Corporation America

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

James C. Yoon

S. Michael Song

Albert Shih

Kirin K. Gill

Counsel for Respondents

Acer Inc., Acer America Corporation,

BenQ Corp., and BenQ America Corp.

KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP

Michael A. Dorfman

Counsel for Respondents

Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. and

Sanyo Manufacturing Corporation
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen


Summaries of

Samsung Elecs. Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)
Nov 10, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Samsung Elecs. Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. AU OPTRONICS CORP., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)

Date published: Nov 10, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)