Summary
In Samson v Freedman (102 N.Y. 699, 701) the court held: "An account thus stated is not conclusive upon either party, but is simply prima facie, presumptively correct and may be impeached for any error included by fraud or mistake."
Summary of this case from Matter of WilsonOpinion
Argued September 23, 1886
Decided June 1, 1886
Melville H. Regensberger for appellants.
James Dunne for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance of order and for judgment absolute against defendant on stipulation.
All concur.
Order affirmed, and judgment accordingly.