From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sams v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 6, 2012
No. 1:11-cv-3111-CL (D. Or. Apr. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:11-cv-3111-CL

04-06-2012

MARK G. SAMS, Petitioner, v. J.E. THOMAS, Respondent.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983).

I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that this petition must be dismissed without prejudice because petitioner has failed to pay the filing fee, request an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or request an extension of time. Accordingly, I adopt the Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#4) is adopted. The petition (#1) is dismissed without prejudice. The court denies a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

OWEN M. FANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sams v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 6, 2012
No. 1:11-cv-3111-CL (D. Or. Apr. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Sams v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:MARK G. SAMS, Petitioner, v. J.E. THOMAS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 6, 2012

Citations

No. 1:11-cv-3111-CL (D. Or. Apr. 6, 2012)