From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sampson v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
May 20, 2020
294 So. 3d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2D19-326

05-20-2020

David Rohalia SAMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Deana K. Marshall of Law Office of Deana K. Marshall, P.A., Riverview, for Appellant.


Deana K. Marshall of Law Office of Deana K. Marshall, P.A., Riverview, for Appellant.

We affirm without discussion the postconviction court's order denying David Rohalia Sampson's motion for postconviction relief, which he filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Mr. Sampson may have to seek review under rule 3.800(a) of the sentencing issue that he first raised in his motion for rehearing of the order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion.

NORTHCUTT, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Sampson v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
May 20, 2020
294 So. 3d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Sampson v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROHALIA SAMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: May 20, 2020

Citations

294 So. 3d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)