From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sampson v. Konica Minolta Bus. Sols. U.S.A.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 18, 2022
2:20-CV-02223-KJD-DJA (D. Nev. Nov. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-CV-02223-KJD-DJA

11-18-2022

ADRIAN A. SAMPSON, Plaintiff, v. KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A., INC., Defendant No

FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP SCOTT M. MAHONEY, Attorney for Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc. GREGORY W. STEVENS Attorneys for Plaintiff


FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP SCOTT M. MAHONEY, Attorney for Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.

GREGORY W. STEVENS Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request)

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time within which Defendant may reply to Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 31), up to and including December 19, 2022. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 24) was filed August 19, 2022. The extension is requested because defense counsel recently had COVID for approximately two weeks and has numerous hearings, mediations, depositions and briefs due in other matters in the next month. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Sampson v. Konica Minolta Bus. Sols. U.S.A.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 18, 2022
2:20-CV-02223-KJD-DJA (D. Nev. Nov. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Sampson v. Konica Minolta Bus. Sols. U.S.A.

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN A. SAMPSON, Plaintiff, v. KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 18, 2022

Citations

2:20-CV-02223-KJD-DJA (D. Nev. Nov. 18, 2022)