Opinion
2:22-cv-00588-GMN-VCF
08-06-2022
DAVID SAMPSON, individually, Plaintiff, v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and ROE CORPORATIONS I - V, inclusive, and DOES I through V, Defendants.
LAW OFFICE OF DAVID SAMPSON David Sampson Nevada Bar No. 6811 Attorney for Plaintiff McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP Jonathan W. Carlson Jonathan W. Carlson Nevada Bar No. 10536 Frank A Toddre, II Nevada Bar No. 11474 Henry H Kim Nevada Bar No. 14390 Attorneys for GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
LAW OFFICE OF DAVID SAMPSON David Sampson Nevada Bar No. 6811 Attorney for Plaintiff
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP Jonathan W. Carlson Jonathan W. Carlson Nevada Bar No. 10536 Frank A Toddre, II Nevada Bar No. 11474 Henry H Kim Nevada Bar No. 14390 Attorneys for GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties above named, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the above-entitled matter be dismissed with prejudice and that all pending motions with the Court are withdrawn as moot.
Each party will bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.