From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sampson v. 3M Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 9, 2018
178 A.3d 1274 (N.J. 2018)

Opinion

M–677 September Term 2017 M–678 September Term 2017 M–679 September Term 2017 M–680 September Term 2017 080316

02-09-2018

Audrey SAMPSON, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motions of BASF Catalysts, LLC for leave to file an overlength brief (M–677) and to impound the record pending disposition of the appeal in the Appellate Division (M–680) are granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal (M–679) is granted and the matter is summarily remanded to the Superior Court, Appellate Division to consider on the merits; and it is further

ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a reply brief (M–678) is denied.


Summaries of

Sampson v. 3M Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 9, 2018
178 A.3d 1274 (N.J. 2018)
Case details for

Sampson v. 3M Co.

Case Details

Full title:Audrey SAMPSON, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Feb 9, 2018

Citations

178 A.3d 1274 (N.J. 2018)
232 N.J. 162