From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samph v. Morgan One Steel, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jun 23, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-732-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Jun. 23, 2015)

Opinion

Case No: 2:14-cv-732-FtM-29DNF

06-23-2015

WILLIAM SAMPH, on their own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated and CHRISTOPHER LITTRELL, on their own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MORGAN ONE STEEL, INC., a Florida profit corporation, MORGAN ONE STEEL, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and SCOTT J. MORGAN, individually, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #19), filed June 15, 2015, recommending that the Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #18) be granted, the Settlement Agreement be approved, and the case dismissed. On June 22, 2015, the parties filed a Joint Notice of Non-Opposition to Report and Recommendation (Doc. #20).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #19) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein.

2. The parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #18) is granted and the Settlement Agreement (Doc. #18-1) is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute.

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 23rd day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

JOHN E. STEELE

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies:
Hon. Douglas N. Frazier
United States Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented parties


Summaries of

Samph v. Morgan One Steel, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jun 23, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-732-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Jun. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Samph v. Morgan One Steel, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SAMPH, on their own behalf and on behalf of those similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

Citations

Case No: 2:14-cv-732-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Jun. 23, 2015)