From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samonte v. State

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Sep 3, 2021
No. SCPW-21-0000458 (Haw. Sep. 3, 2021)

Opinion

SCPW-21-0000458

09-03-2021

LAEL SAMONTE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge To'oto'o, assigned in place of Eddins, J., recused.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Upon consideration of the document submitted by petitioner Lael Samonte entitled, "Defense Counsels Motion for Judgment of Acquittal," which was filed as a petition for writ of mandamus on August 9, 2021, petitioner fails to demonstrate that he is entitled to the requested extraordinary relief from this court. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fees.


Summaries of

Samonte v. State

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Sep 3, 2021
No. SCPW-21-0000458 (Haw. Sep. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Samonte v. State

Case Details

Full title:LAEL SAMONTE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Sep 3, 2021

Citations

No. SCPW-21-0000458 (Haw. Sep. 3, 2021)