From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samolewski v. Schoenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1987
130 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

May 18, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McInerney, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The determination by the respondents that the storage building that the petitioners proposed to erect on the subject property would constitute a second main building on the petitioners' premises in contravention of Huntington Town Code § 198-70 was neither illegal, arbitrary, nor an abuse of discretion, and must, therefore, be upheld (cf., Matter of Bockis v. Kayser, 112 A.D.2d 222). Bracken, J.P., Niehoff, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Samolewski v. Schoenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1987
130 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Samolewski v. Schoenfeld

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT R. SAMOLEWSKI et al., Appellants, v. MICHAEL P. SCHOENFELD et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 18, 1987

Citations

130 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)