From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sammitt v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 12, 1925
104 So. 925 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

8 Div. 214.

April 14, 1925. Rehearing Denied May 12, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Limestone County; Osceola Kyle, Judge.

R.E. Smith, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The indictment contained two counts. Count 1 charged that defendant did distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol. Count 2, in proper form and substance, charged him with the unlawful possession of a still, etc. The conviction rested upon the second count, and the evidence was ample to support the verdict of the jury and to sustain the judgment of conviction. This evidence was without dispute or conflict, and an examination of the record, including each ruling of the court to which an exception was reserved, fails to disclose any error of record, and the court committed no reversible error in any of its several rulings. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Sammitt v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 12, 1925
104 So. 925 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Sammitt v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charlie SAMMITT v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 12, 1925

Citations

104 So. 925 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
104 So. 925