From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sambataro v. Compagnone

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 22, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51506 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)

Opinion

570147/04.

Decided September 22, 2005.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court, New York County, dated December 24, 2003 (Debra Rose Samuels, J.) which denied his motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213.

Order dated December 24, 2003 (Debra Rose Samuels, J.) reversed, with $10 costs, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint is granted.

PRESENT: HON. WILLIAM P. McCOOE, J.P., HON. WILLIAM J. DAVIS, HON. MARTIN SCHOENFELD, Justices.


Plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment in this action to enforce a default judgment issued by an Italian court. Even assuming, without deciding, that defendant's ultimate appearance in the Italian court did not constitute a voluntary appearance pursuant to CPLR 5305 (a) (2) (cf. CIBC Mellon Trust Company v. Mora Hotel Corporation, N.V., 100 NY2d 215, cert denied 540 US 948), no basis is shown for us to deny recognition of the judgment (CPLR 5304). The Italian court had a valid basis for exercising jurisdiction over defendant under concepts recognized in New York law ( CIBC Mellon Trust v. Mora Hotel Corporation, N.V., 296 AD2d 81, 96 aff'd 100 NY2d 215 cert denied 540 US 948 citing Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons. Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR 5305 C5305:1, at 556). Defendant was served at his place of business in Vignola, Italy, at an address designated in his written correspondence with plaintiff.

Nor did defendant raise a triable issue as to whether he received notice of the proceedings in sufficient time to enable him to defend (CPLR 5304 [b][2]). A reasonable method of notification was employed and a reasonable opportunity to be heard was afforded to defendant ( see, Gondre v. Silberstein, 744 F. Supp 429, 434 [EDNY, 1990]). We also note that it was not improper for plaintiff to place his supporting proof before the court by way of an attorney's affirmation annexing the foreign judgment, proof of service and other documentary evidence ( Olan v. Farrell Lines Incorporated, 64 NY2d 1092, 1093).

This constitutes the decision and order of the court.

I concur.

I concur.

I concur.


Summaries of

Sambataro v. Compagnone

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 22, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51506 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
Case details for

Sambataro v. Compagnone

Case Details

Full title:GIUSEPPE SAMBATARO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROCCO COMPAGNONE…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 22, 2005

Citations

2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51506 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)