From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samaroo v. The Bank of N.Y. Mellon

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 13, 2021
21 Civ. 2441 (AT) (KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 2441 (AT) (KHP)

12-13-2021

KARAMCHAND SAMAROO, Plaintiff, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”), ECF No. 25, of the Honorable Katharine H. Parker, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error and found none. Santiago v. Colvin, No. 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014).

The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. By January 17, 2022, Plaintiff may amend his complaint to allege the supporting facts outlined in the R&R.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 12, and to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Samaroo v. The Bank of N.Y. Mellon

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 13, 2021
21 Civ. 2441 (AT) (KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Samaroo v. The Bank of N.Y. Mellon

Case Details

Full title:KARAMCHAND SAMAROO, Plaintiff, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 13, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 2441 (AT) (KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2021)

Citing Cases

La Belle v. Barclays Capital Inc.

Likewise, in Samaroo v. Bank of New York Mellon, the court rejected portions of the plaintiff's SOX claim…