From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sam v. Rockwell Hud Systems, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 24, 2002
44 F. App'x 106 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion


44 Fed.Appx. 106 (9th Cir. 2002) Farzad SAM, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. ROCKWELL HUD SYSTEMS INC., Delaware Corporation; Kaiser Flight Dynamics Inc., a Delaware Corporation, dba Flight Dynamics, Defendants--Appellees. Kambiz Ghahreman, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. Rockwell Hud Systems Inc.; Kaiser Flight Dynamics Inc., Defendants--Appellees. Nos. 01-35015, 01-35016. D.C. Nos. CV-99-01749-KI, CV 00-00077-KI. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 24, 2002

Argued and Submitted July 12, 2002.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Garr M. King, District Judge, Presiding.

Before GOODWIN, T.G. NELSON, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion granting summary judgment by District Judge King.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sam v. Rockwell Hud Systems, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 24, 2002
44 F. App'x 106 (9th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

Sam v. Rockwell Hud Systems, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Farzad SAM, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. ROCKWELL HUD SYSTEMS INC., Delaware…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 24, 2002

Citations

44 F. App'x 106 (9th Cir. 2002)