From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sam v. Farkas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 20, 1960
11 A.D.2d 1079 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

October 20, 1960

Appeal from the Chautauqua Special Term.

Present — Bastow, J.P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.


Orders insofar as appealed from unanimously modified to provide that the objections to the complaint that the writing upon which the causes of action are based is unenforcible under the provisions of the Statute of Frauds are overruled and the defendant is permitted to allege the same facts as a defense in her answer, and as modified the orders are affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: In the exercise of a proper discretion the objections to the complaint should be overruled and defendant permitted to allege the same facts as a defense in her answer. (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 108.)


Summaries of

Sam v. Farkas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 20, 1960
11 A.D.2d 1079 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

Sam v. Farkas

Case Details

Full title:CASTLE A. SAM, Respondent, v. MAY FARKAS, Individually and as Executrix of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1960

Citations

11 A.D.2d 1079 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Citing Cases

Scarvalone v. Kowalewicz

Appellants' remaining arguments seek to interject the Statute of Frauds as a bar to the relief sought. The…