From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sam v. Delacruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-0991 AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-0991 AC P

10-03-2019

VISNA SAM, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY DELACRUZ, Defendant.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order issued August 8, 2019, the complaint was rejected on screening and plaintiff was given thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 4. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: October 3, 2019

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Sam v. Delacruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-0991 AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2019)
Case details for

Sam v. Delacruz

Case Details

Full title:VISNA SAM, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY DELACRUZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 3, 2019

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-0991 AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2019)