From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sam v. Cropp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 19, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:16CV577 (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:16CV577

10-19-2016

DAUNG SAM, Petitioner, v. RICHARD CROPP, et al., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on July 26, 2016, the Court conditionally docketed Petitioner's action. At that time, the Court warned Petitioner that he must keep the Court informed as to his current address if he was released or was relocated. On September 21, 2016, the United States Postal Service returned a September 14, 2016 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER," because Petitioner apparently relocated. Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiff's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

M. Hannah Lauck

United States District Judge Date: OCT 19 2016
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Sam v. Cropp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 19, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:16CV577 (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2016)
Case details for

Sam v. Cropp

Case Details

Full title:DAUNG SAM, Petitioner, v. RICHARD CROPP, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Oct 19, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:16CV577 (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2016)