From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salzman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 16, 1992
601 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1992)

Opinion

No. 79219.

July 16, 1992.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Second District — Case No. 91-00034, Hillsborough County.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Timothy A. Hickey, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Brenda S. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.


We have for review Salzman v. State, 591 So.2d 1107 (Fla.2d DCA 1992), based on asserted direct and express conflict with State v. Camp, 579 So.2d 763 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), approved, 596 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 1992).

We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.

Because we recently approved the Fifth District's decision in Camp, we quash the decision below and remand for the dismissal of the counts for dealing in stolen property.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Salzman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 16, 1992
601 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1992)
Case details for

Salzman v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN SALZMAN, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 16, 1992

Citations

601 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1992)