From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salzman v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 15, 1946
270 App. Div. 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

May 15, 1946.

Present — Taylor, P.J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Larkin, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Struhl v. Travelers Insurance Co. ( 255 App. Div. 527, affd. 281 N.Y. 584). All concur, except Taylor, P.J., and Harris, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for granting a new trial on the ground that the retention and cashing of the check sent the company in April, 1942, and the manner in which the so-called reinstatement application was obtained and filled out, and the failure to prove the sending of the notice required by section 151 Ins. of the Insurance Law presented questions of fact. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action under a life insurance policy.)


Summaries of

Salzman v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 15, 1946
270 App. Div. 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Salzman v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Case Details

Full title:EVA SALZMAN et al., as Administrators of the Estate of MORRIS SALZMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 15, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)