Salzano v. Hirtz

Full title: James A. SALZANO, Appellant, v. Irene HIRTZ, Defendant-Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 22, 1965

353 F.2d 536 (2d Cir. 1965)

Opinion

No. 138, Docket 29728.

Argued November 5, 1965.

Decided November 22, 1965.

Louis R. Harolds, New York City, Schwartz Horowitz, Jersey City, N.J. (Standard, Weisberg Harolds, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Harold V. McCoy, New York City, Casper B. Ughetta, New York City (John G. Reilly and Reilly Reilly, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges, and TIMBERS, District Judge.^_

_ Chief Judge of the District Court of Connecticut, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

This is an ordinary, run of the mill personal injury action. The parties differ on the place and manner of the accident, and on the causal relationship and extent of appellant's injuries. Conflicting testimony was presented to the jury; there was substantial evidence to support the result that the jury reached.

Appellant claims numerous other trial errors. His contentions are either insubstantial or incorrect.

Affirmed.